Itâs been a busy week for Cracker Barrel Old Country Storeâs marketing team.
The restaurant chain announced a rebrand and new logo last week, faced widespread criticism from social media users, including President Donald Trump, and proceeded to walk back its plan to change the logo.
In that span of time, the company lost and regained almost $100 million in market value, bringing it about back to where it started. The stock gained 8% on Wednesday.
The Cracker Barrel saga is just the latest example of a consumer-facing company making big branding decisions, then pulling back after alienating its customer base.
âItâs very tricky to be a brand for everyone today,â Carreen Winters, president of reputation at the global public relations firm MikeWorldWide, said in an interview. âLegacy brands are particularly tricky, because you have to figure out what is cherished and authentic from the old and marry it with the new.
âIn Cracker Barrelâs case, theyâre trying to attract a new, younger customer [which] is no longer sufficient,â she continued. âYou need to actually think about all of your stakeholders and how they will react, respond, feel about what youâre doing or the direction youâre taking. And you need to be sure that what youâre doing is consistent with shared values.â
Rebranding failures are not a new phenomenon. One of the most famous marketing blunders of all time happened in 1985 when the Coca-Cola company introduced âNew Cokeâ with a new formula. After a firestorm of outrage from its customers, the company returned to its classic formula a few months later.
But social media has made backlash from consumers faster and more widespread, meaning businesses are usually quicker to walk back on their branding failures.
In 2010, retailer Gap ditched its decades-old blue box logo for a more minimalist design. It faced intense backlash on social media through thousands of engagements and, within less than a week, the company said it was reverting to its original logo.
More recently in May, Warner Bros. Discovery announced its streaming platform would undergo another name change, after switching from HBO to HBO Max to Max and then back again to HBO Max.
Major rebrands donât always go awry. For example, Kentucky Fried Chicken successfully rebranded to KFC in 1991. Its customers already used the acronym and the rebrand signified that the restaurant chain offers more than just fried chicken.
Dunkinâ Donuts also successfully underwent its name change to Dunkinâ in 2019. It did face some criticism from its loyal customers at the time, but Winters said today the âDunkinââ name and branding are widely accepted over its original name.
âDunkinâ rebranded in accordance with the behavior that the customer created,â she said. âIt aligned with their strategy of being more than Donuts and really building their coffee business.â
She also mentioned IHOP as an example of a brand that has been able to freshen up its look and stay relevant in culture. She said IHOPâs change has been an âevolution, not a revolution.â
Beth LaGuardia Cooper, chief marketing officer at Advantage, The Authority Company, added during an interview that Starbucks had subtle changes to its logo over time, which allowed it to hold the base of its identity close.
While some social media users disliked Cracker Barrelâs new branding simply because they said it lacked substance and was too âsterileâ or âsoulless,â others, especially conservatives, claimed the new logo leaned into âwokenessâ and diversity efforts.
Cracker Barrel is widely considered a classic American restaurant chain. It began in Tennessee in 1969 and its branding evokes Southern charm and nostalgia for its consumer base.
Eric Schiffer, chairman of the firm Reputation Management Consultants, said the new branding, without the iconic âUncle Herschelâ figure, suggested to conservatives that having a white man featured on the logo was wrong or politically incorrect.
He said that pushback represents a larger trend where conservatives are feeling under attack by diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
âI think the perspective of conservatives is, donât ruin Cracker Barrel with the Bud Light meets Jaguar marketing playbook,â said Schiffer, adding that those brands âattempted to disrupt positively and what they did was they nuked brand sentiment and shareholder confidence.â
In November, Tata Motors-owned Jaguar Land Rover announced a rebrand that removed its âleaperâ big cat imagery from its logo and changed the brandâs font. Its new promotional materials included brightly dressed models, but no cars. The brand faced significant pushback, including tens of thousands of responses on social media.
Elon Musk criticized the company on X at the time, asking Jaguarâs official account: âDo you sell cars?â
Earlier this month, Trump piped in with his insults, calling Jaguarâs ad campaign âstupidâ and âseriously WOKE.â
The Telegraph reported in May that Jaguar was searching for a new advertising agency after the public backlash.
Similarly, Anheuser-Busch InBevâs Bud Light faced heavy criticism from conservatives in 2023 after a collaboration between the beer brand and social influencer Dylan Mulvaney, who is transgender.
âIf youâre trying to be a tough, male-focused, football fan-oriented beer, the last thing you want to do is put the wrong spokesperson in front of the brand,â Schiffer said. âIt will turn off that audience and it allows competitors to capture that market share.â
âThe throughline in all of this is, donât rip apart and disrespect audiences that brought you to the dance,â Schiffer said. âFind a way, if youâre going to want to expand, do it in a way that doesnât cut at the core of what the brand stands for â and in the process, create cognitive dissonance and blow up market cap.â
Branding experts told CNBC that at the end of the day, people are talking about Cracker Barrel, which is a win for the company by itself.
âEverybody loves a comeback in America,â LaGuardia Cooper said. âSo I would root for them to make this happen, make something good out of it.â
